Tradition vs Fusion


Food is one of the most recognizable factors that differentiate cultures around the world. Methods of cooking, ingredient choices, and table etiquette are a few ways certain dishes are kept “traditional” to a culture. The United States has been called the “melting pot of cultures” for its high ethnic diversity, and this is also observed in the emergence of fusion cuisine. Fusion cuisine, also known as fusion foods, are foods prepared by combining elements of two different culinary traditions. With the growing popularity of fusion foods catching the attention of millennials, food traditionalists argue that the line between the two are beginning to blur. On the other hand, fusion food is also bringing attention to otherwise globally unrecognized cuisines. Fusion foods are created by breaking culinary traditions, but are not intended to disrespect its originating countries. Fusion foods expose the value in different cultures through combining them in complementary ways, and rather than disrespect them, celebrate these cuisines while increasing their visibility. 
There is value in remembering cuisine from one generation to the next because history can be preserved through food. For example, there was a growing need for portable and sustainable foodstuffs while the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas were at war around 7000 BC. Since women at that time were historically taken to battle as army cooks, they came up with the tamale to satisfy the needs of the warring members of their tribe. The dish made from unprepared masa and corn husks has since then been passed down for generations and is globally recognized as a traditional Central American cuisine. As long as tamales are present in restaurants across the world, Central America’s history will live along with it.
There is more than just history in passing on culinary traditions, there is also the maintenance of flavor profiles. Jiro Ono, owner of three-Michelin star restaurant, Sukiyabashi Jiro, has been making traditional nigiri sushi for over 50 years. Ono values tradition above all and has passed on his preparation and cooking methods to his sons and apprentices. Ono’s commitment to consistency and tradition has been described, “the difference between Jiro today and Jiro 40 years ago is only that he stopped smoking.” His dedication and mastery of work earned his restaurant the highest culinary award a restaurant can achieve in the world.
From the above, it is clear that traditional foods are necessary to retain cultural history as well as certain flavors and food quality; however, not all passed on dishes are necessarily traditional. Even some of the most globally recognizable foods are fusion foods. For example, the Vietnamese banh mi uses Vietnamese cooked meat, fresh herbs, spices, and pickled vegetables, but is stuffed in a French baguette. This dish combines traditional Vietnamese flavors and a French staple food. Another example of a recognizable, passed on fusion food is the Filipino halo-halo, which is a dessert containing an assortment of sweet beans and fruits, topped with shaved ice and ice cream. Despite halo-halo being one of the most recognizable Filipino dishes, its origins draw from the Japanese dessert, kakigori, which is shaved ice sweetened with condensed milk and flavored syrup.
Even though banh mi and halo-halo are both fusion foods, they also provide historical value just as the traditional tamale and sushi do. Banh mi and halo-halo are just a couple examples of dishes influenced by their countries’ colonizers. Vietnam was colonized by the French in 1858 and the Philippines was occupied by the Japanese during WWII, and this history remains alive as long as these dishes are. Despite this history of colonization, countries like Vietnam and the Philippines continue utilizing the ingredients and techniques introduced by other cuisines because they find a way to use them to empower their own cuisine. It is an opportunity to take their own cultural spin on the original, and improve upon it to cater to their country’s flavor profile.
Jordan Andino, owner of Filipino Taqueria, FlipSigi, has popularized a menu in New York combining Japanese, Filipino, Mexican, Korean, Hawaiian, and American cuisine. Items from his menu include Flip Ramen, which is a rendition of Japanese ramen with adobo broth, and Sinigang Fries, which are fries seasoned with banana ketchup, tamarind, garlic, sugar, and a few other ingredients used in the Filipino sour soup, Sinigang. From the forefront, Andino does not claim his restaurant is traditionally Filipino—he makes it clear that he is presenting fusion cuisine. Andino comments his restaurant’s concept is an “introduction to Filipino food,” and created his menu to make the food more accessible and “palatable” to people from all over the world. Though “palatable” is a seemingly harsh word to use, Andino makes the observation that certain cuisines are more appealing to a region than other cuisines. This isn’t to say that certain cuisines are more acceptable to a region because of taste alone, but also because of worldwide trends and food translation.
Coverage in the media and familiarity of ingredients and flavor are factors that estimate why certain cuisines are more recognized than others. Chinese, Mexican, Italian, Greek, and Japanese, are the top five recognized ethnic cuisines in America as of 2018. Dishes from these cuisines are seen in movies from The Avengers to Rush Hour, and normalize these types of cuisine in mainstream America. In contrast, there are certain cuisines that are featured in shows such as Bizzare Foods with Andrew Zimmern, which features an American man going around the world trying foods commonly unheard of in the United States. His comments range from praise to disbelief, and this may increase the popularity of some cultures’ cuisines, but for others this may create a larger gap between their food and what is considered regionally acceptable.  
Fusion cuisine chefs like Jordan Andino aren’t trying to disrespect the originating cultures of his dishes, but rather prepare them in a way that appeals to what people around him are comfortable with. For example, Andino’s Sinigang fries goes on the assumption that the American population is generally comfortable with the concept of loaded fries, as seen in Mexican cuisine, and uses it as an opportunity to introduce the sweet and sour profile from the banana ketchup and tamarind seasoning base from common Filipino cuisine. There are differing opinions on how fusion foods affect the way society views certain cuisines, but ultimately traditional and fusion cuisine are not mutually exclusive. Traditional and fusion cuisine may not carry the same weight of cultural pride, but are both valuable ways culture and history are preserved and seen.


Works Cited

Hamilton, Gordon. “What Is Fusion Cooking and Cuisine? An Explanation and Recipe Examples.” Delishably, 17 Mar. 2016, delishably.com/food-industry/what-is-fusion-cooking.
Mitchell, Christopher. “Why We Love Some Asian Cuisines and Not Others.” Peril Magazine, 12 Feb. 2013, peril.com.au/topics/culture/why-we-love-some-asian-cuisines-and-not-others/.
“The History and Origins of Banh Mi.” Lion Brand Rice: Jasmine Rice Australia, 23 Feb. 2018, www.lionbrand.com.au/blog/the-history-and-origins-of-banh-mi.
“The Surprising Origin of Philippines' Beloved Dessert.” FilipiKnow, 18 Jan. 2019, filipiknow.net/halo-halo-filipino-dessert/.
Tuder, Stefanie. “Filipino Taqueria Joins the Upper East Side.” Eater NY, 14 Sept. 2017, ny.eater.com/2017/9/14/16308328/flip-sigi-open-photos-menu-upper-east-side-nyc.

Comments


  1. Yes, food is an important factor in defining culture, and fusion cuisine bridges the gap between multiple cultures. While it can be delicious, it holds no weight to specific cultures, therefore it is not a participant in culture itself. Mastery of fusion foods does not exist. Fusion food is an example of homogenization of cultures, so it cannot bear cultural value.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jerica, I really appreciate your sharing of this blog post. Fusion food is something I often enjoy consuming, so you have offered a really interesting analysis on the significance of this type of food preparation. I wonder if critics might argue, though, at what point does food fusion become a form of palatable appropriation? Using your example of Jordan Andino’s Filipino Taqueria, it seems as though his approach of blending the most popular dishes of Mexican cuisine with the unique flavors of Filipino dishes can be viewed as problematic or culturally insensitive to the virtues of traditional Filipino meals. Yes, he is offering an entrĂ©e into the world of these dishes, giving people the opportunity to try Filipino food without fully committing to all of its unique flavors. But, it seems that his rendition of Filipino food can imply that his consumers would not have otherwise been open to trying traditional Filipino delicacies without having been drawn in first by the appeal of mixing it with the more familiar flavors of Mexican food they are used to consuming. Moreover, in adapting traditional dishes and fusing them with more popular and known flavors, it is almost as if he is picking and choosing certain characteristics to make his food more popular, capitalizing off his appropriation rather than attempting to expose his eaters to the virtues of eating authentic Filipino cuisine.

    Some may argue that another danger of fusion food is that if it gains more notoriety over the more traditional dishes themselves, threatening to undermine the culture from which it was inspired. As a result, the history and the culture transferred through various recipes becomes almost immediately lost, and a new kind of food story begins being told. We know now of the Tamales the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas created from the foods they had access to, but was this not a form of food fusion itself? If so, their stories are preserved, but what of the foods that came before that? It is a complicated issue, but I think you do an excellent job of presenting your argument!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment